Remy makes a serious argument: your people are already building software with AI, so give it a governed foundation to run on. It is the right answer to the question it asks. SpeqForge asks a different one. Before anything is built, somebody has to work out whether it should exist, what it has to do, and how you would know it worked, and Remy staffs none of that. We do, and then we build it too.
Feedback → ranked specs
Architecture, stack, trade-offs
Flows, states, mockups
Edge cases, test plans
Positioning, launch copy
Tickets, replies, follow-up
Hosting, database, vector search, auth, file storage, email delivery, domains and TLS, so an app an employee described has somewhere real to live. Genuinely good, and more of it than most teams would build.
SSO and SAML, role-based access, per-tenant isolation, encryption at rest, a choice of data regions and immutable audit trails. The strongest part of the product, and stronger than ours today.
Ledger, Support, Sales Bench and the rest are the internal apps most companies rent, shipped in the box so you stop renting them.
“Our support team needs a tool to track escalations, and it has to pass IT review.”
A working escalations tracker, running on infrastructure your IT team will sign off on, with the audit trail and the access controls already in place. That is a real answer and a good one. It will also build the workflow your support lead described in one sentence, including the assumption that an escalation belongs to a person rather than an account, which is why the same customer will open four of them.
Remy governs how software gets built and where it runs. It does not put anyone in the chair before that, so an app is only ever as good as the sentence an employee typed. SpeqForge staffs the deciding: research, ranked options, a spec with acceptance criteria, an architecture review, and the reasoning kept next to the result.
Remy is aimed at the software you would otherwise buy, such as the ledger, the tracker and the internal support desk. SpeqForge is aimed at the product you sell, and the business around it: the public feedback portal, the campaigns, the inbox, the phone. Different halves of a company.
Every app here ships with a test suite the build refuses to pass without. A failing test fails the build like a type error and sends the agent back. A rollback button is what you reach for after the bad build shipped; a gate is what stops it shipping.
Apps build from your workboard. Each item carries context, scope, inputs and a definition of done, so what ships is what was agreed and the trail from decision to code is readable months later, by someone who was not there.
On the compliance question, plainly. Remy holds SOC 2 Type I and II and runs in four regions. We hold no SOC 2 report, which is an auditor’s attestation over an observation window rather than something a vendor can self-declare, and we run in the United States by choice rather than by accident. If your procurement team needs the report on file or the data inside another border, they are ahead of us today, and you should hear that from us rather than find it out.
Feedback arrives, the PM reads it, the spec updates, the item goes back on the board and the app is rebuilt. A platform hands you uptime and stops there, which is the correct thing for a platform to do and not enough on its own.
No. SOC 2 Type II is an audit conducted over an observation window, and we are not going to claim a certificate we do not hold. If that is a hard requirement for your procurement team today, Remy clears a bar we do not.
The United States. We are a US platform by choice, where Remy runs in four regions. Customers outside the US are welcome and are covered by a data processing agreement with standard contractual clauses. The one case we cannot serve is a legal requirement that the data physically stay inside another border, as a regulated public-sector or healthcare buyer in the EU might need. If that is you, Remy can do it and we cannot.
Enterprise SSO over SAML 2.0 and OIDC, scoped per workspace with a verified email domain and just-in-time provisioning; SCIM directory sync; TOTP multi-factor; refresh tokens with reuse detection; the database encrypted at rest and every stored object envelope-encrypted with rotating keys; GDPR export and erasure; and a tamper-evident audit log you can read and export as OCSF for your own SIEM. Roles are owner, admin, member, billing and viewer, with spending and connected-account credentials reserved to the owner. What we do not have is a second region or a SOC 2 report.
Because governance answers how software is built and where it runs, and most wasted engineering is neither. It is work that was governed impeccably and should never have been started. We put researched, specified, argued-over decisions in front of the build, and that is the part Remy leaves to whoever typed the request.
Partly, and it is not the pitch. There is a CRM, an inbox, a calendar, forms, campaigns, contracts and an operations tool in the box, so a lot of the small stuff stops being a subscription. But we are built around the product you sell, not around the tools you use to run the office.
Yes, and for a large company that is the honest answer. Run internal apps where your IT team wants them. Use SpeqForge for the product work in front of it: what to build, why, the spec, and the thing itself.